![]() ![]() Krishna’s life is not that neat and clear-cut, it cannot be. To me, it seems that Rama’s life is clear-cut and defined there is nothing hazy about it. I have nothing to do with them therefore, I can see them exactly as they are, and I will say the truth. But I am a follower of no one I follow neither Rama nor Krishna. In the same way devotees of Krishna are allergic to Rama – and it is natural. ![]() It is obvious that followers of Rama do not accept Krishna they don’t even want to hear his name. I don’t know if they have a comparative evaluation of Hanumana and Meera – perhaps not – but they have certainly evaluated Rama and Krishna, judging Krishna to be the highest among all the Hindu avataras, all the Hindu incarnations. It does not accept Rama as a complete incarnation of God Krishna alone is accepted as such. ![]() “It is wrong to say that your tradition does not make a distinction between Rama and Krishna. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |